Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02244
Original file (BC 2014 02244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-02244
		
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 9 Sep 13, rather than 
23 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for 
appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in 
service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to the 
Reserve.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 23 Jul 13, the applicant separated from the Regular Air 
Force.

On 10 Sep 13, the applicant was appointed as an officer in the 
Air Force Reserve and is currently serving in the grade of 
captain (O-3) in the USAFR.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPA recommends approval in regards to adjusting the 
applicant’s date of separation (DOS) to prevent a break in 
service.  Due to a delay in processing of the 27 May 13 scroll 
at the Secretary of Defense (SecDef) level, the applicant 
incurred a break in service between her Date of Separation (DOS) 
and her appointment date in the Air Force Reserve.  While the 
applicant’s scroll was processed prior to her release from 
active duty, it was not approved until after her discharge, 
creating a break in service.  In accordance with Deputy SecDef 
Memorandum, dated 2 May 05, all military officer appointments 
under Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 12203, not 
approved by 30 Jun 05, will be submitted to the SecDef for 
approval.  Therefore, because the applicant’s appointment as a 
Reserve officer had not been approved, she was unable to be 
commissioned as a Reserve officer.

Current policies do not allow for backdating oaths; however, 
SAF/GCM and the AFBCMR have determined that the AFBCMR has the 
authority to adjust the date of separation for these officers to 
prevent a break in service.  SecDef General Council determined 
the appointment date is the date SecDef approves the appointment 
or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later.  The 
applicant’s break in service was due to no fault of her own.  
Therefore, the appropriate action to eliminate the applicant’s 
break in service would be to adjust the applicant’s DOS to 
coincide with her appointment in the Air Force Reserve.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of 
the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the 
case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale 
for our conclusion that the applicant has been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s 
records be corrected as indicated below. 


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 
23 July 2013, she was not released from active duty, but on that 
date, continued to serve on active duty until 9 September 2013, 
when she was released from active duty..


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02244 in Executive Session on 25 Feb 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPA, dated 23 Jun 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.	

			

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01741

    Original file (BC 2014 01741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval in regards to adjusting the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03138

    Original file (BC 2014 03138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03138 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 30 Jul 13, rather than 17 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04426

    Original file (BC-2012-04426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She separated from the Regular Air Force effective 27 June 2011 and was appointed an officer in the USAFR effective 19 July 2011 (date of SecDef approval). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01474

    Original file (BC 2014 01474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01474 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) be changed to 23 Oct 12, rather than 27 Sep 12, to prevent a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, he was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when he transferred from the Regular Air Force to the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03307

    Original file (BC 2014 03307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) be changed to 1 May 14, rather than 28 Feb 14, to prevent a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, he was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when he transferred from the Regular Air Force to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05291

    Original file (BC 2013 05291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02522

    Original file (BC 2014 02522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. Due to a delay in processing of the 21 Jan 13 scroll at Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) level, which was created by the In-Service Recruiter's late submission, the applicant incurred a break in service between applicant's DOS and appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04007

    Original file (BC 2013 04007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service dates be adjusted to remove her break in service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Officers with a regular commission cannot be gained into the United States Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02042

    Original file (BC 2014 02042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was not discharged from the Air Force on 15 May 13, but on that date, she was continued on active duty through 30 Jul 13, on which date she was released from active duty.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03560

    Original file (BC 2013 03560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date the SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...